The South Australian Cabinet endorsed the projections for use by state agencies on 17 June 2019. The projections are based on the final results from the 2016 Census of Population and Housing and supersede those published in 2015. The medium series is the likely outcome at the time of publication, while the high and low series enable management of risks if a population trend that is higher or lower than the medium series emerges. These population projections comprise three series (high, medium and low) that reflect the likely range of population futures for South Australia and regions. State borders were also closed intermittently through this period.Īnnual population growth, Greater Adelaide Capital City and balance of South Australia, 2017-22 ** International borders closed in March 2020 and remained closed throughout the 2020 - 2021 reporting period. Population growth in South Australia has recovered strongly in 2022 following the opening of borders post COVID-19** and the subsequent return of overseas migration. Over this time the average growth rate was 0.6% which is half that seen in Greater Adelaide over the same period.Īnnual population growth for Greater Adelaide Capital City and regional South Australia is displayed in the figure below. Over the 5 years to 2022, regional South Australia's population increased by 12,483 people to reach 403,082. The Rakhine issue is specifically mentioned 109 times in the report.Between 20 the Greater Adelaide region grew by 79,446 people from 1.34 million to 1.42 million at an average of 15,889 or 1.2% per year.Ĩ6.4% of South Australia's total population growth between 20 occurred in the Greater Adelaide Capital City region. IDPs are clearly indicated as being most vulnerable to this risk. However this measure may not be fully representative of relative risk across the country. “Among newly displaced populations, CSOs identified food (88 per cent), shelter (55 per cent), protection services (35 per cent), and livelihoods (31 per cent) as the top needs.”Įxtortion (page 69 of the report) states that “Extortion remains a widespread protection issue in Rakhine State and is a growing problem in other regions and states affected by the conflict.Īccording to the Protection Incident Monitoring System (PIMS), some 94 percent of reported extortion incidents were from Rakhine, while others occurred across the Northeast and Southeast, however this may be swayed by the more established humanitarian monitoring presence in Rakhine. “Livelihoods and education support is the most reported need in Rakhine food and protection services are most needed in Kayin and in Kachin, access to livelihoods is the most frequently reported need.” “ A survey of 58 local CSOs working directly with affected communities across Myanmar further underscore these issues." on page 65 highlights the following issues: The top three needs shared with them by the communities they serve are livelihoods, access to food, and protection services, including safe spaces.” Regarding climate change and natural disasters, the report states on page (25) that “ Cyclones and major storms are expected to become more intense as ocean temperatures increase, with residents of Rakhine anticipated to have a higher likelihood of being affected.” On page 21 of the report, it says, “There has been no meaningful progress on the Advisory Commission on Rakhine’s recommendations, aimed at improving the welfare of all people in Rakhine.” On page 69, it also states that "Extortion remains a widespread protection concern in Rakhine, and is increasingly becoming an issue in other regions and states affected by Conflict.” Among newly displaced populations, food (88 percent), shelter (55 percent), protection services (35 percent), and livelihoods (31 percent) are the top needs, it said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |